image_pdfimage_print

Mystery Monday: Murrell DNA, Part 1

This entry is part [part not set] of 4 in the series Murrell DNA
Photographic view of main house, Green Hill Plantation, State Route 728, Long Island vicinity, Campbell County, Virginia. Green Hill Plantation was owned by the Pannill family. (Not related to Murrell family that we know of, although they may have known the house.)

Murrell Family (Click for Family Tree) (Also Roberts)

In the search for our elusive ancestor Wiley Anderson Murrell and his early life and parents, we have employed a combination of the paper trail as well as the latest DNA techniques. Unfortunately the paper trail seems to only begin in 1834 in Botetourt County, Virginia, when Wiley was 28- where was he before that??

Our DNA trail is very confusing. When going back 5-6 generations or more (Wiley is #5 to me), the shared amount of DNA gets less and is less accurate. We have connections all over but cannot tie them together with a paper trail, and that is required to help us learn more about Wiley, who may have been called William A. Murrell as well.

A comparison of DNA matches using GEDmatch indicates that one recently-found cousin and I have our most recent common ancestor at 4.9 generations ago. Since Wiley is #5 to me, it would suggest that she too is descended from Wiley, but her family tree does not include him. Ancestry.com and other DNA services usually give an error margin of 1-2 generations, so she might be descended from Wiley’s parents instead, or maybe his brother. That’s our mystery for today (and probably many days to come)- to find the relationship and then document the ancestors involved.

Looking at her family tree, 5 generations would take us to Major James Murrell (1781-1859). He was born in Lunenberg County, Virginia in 1781- that would make him 24 years old in 1805, when our Wiley was born, so that date does not rule out the Major as Wiley’s father. In 1818, the Major married Nancy Cobbs (1795-1855) in Campbell Co., Virginia. That date suggests that James and Nancy were not Wiley’s parents, since he would have been 13 at the time of their marriage. (Yes, he could have been born out of wedlock, and we know of a case of that within the family of Wiley’s wife, Mary M. Honts, but generally it was not common.) Also, if Nancy’s birth date is correct, she would have been just 10 years old when Wiley was born, so that really does not fit.

One possible explanation for this mystery could be that Wiley was the Major’s son by a first wife, and after her death, the Major’s second wife, Nancy (Cobbs) Murrell raised Wiley. (This is just a hypothesis.)

Let’s verify a number of things, such as the marriage- see below for the sources used to confirm that the marriage of James Murrell and Nancy Cobb took place on 30 May 1818. While these are only transcriptions/abstracts, Ancestry.com does furnish us with the source they used, FHL microfilm #31050. We could check to see if that film is online yet or if it is available anywhere, to use a primary source, or more accurately, an image of a primary source, to confirm the marriage date.

Next, let’s look at this family in the census.

James and Nancy Murrell, 1850 US Federal Census for Campbell County, Virginia.

Of course, we cannot yet be positive this is the same couple and children, as it does not list Nancy’s maiden name, nor that she is his wife. The ages given are ~ correct for the birth years we have for James and Nancy, and they lived in Campbell County, so that does suggest we probably have the correct couple. This census entry lists people who likely are their children, although ‘relationship’ was not a column on the census that year so we would need to verify the connection through other means. (They have the same surname, but they could also be a niece or nephew.)

One of the first things to notice about the children is that Wiley A. Murrell is not listed in this family. In 1850 he was 44 years old, married, and living with his wife and five children in Botetourt County, Virginia (about 60 miles away), so that does not rule out the possibility that he was one of the children of the Major. His wife, Mary Magdalene Honts, was born in Botetourt, where they were married. Her mother had been deserted by her father (that story to come later), so maybe Wiley decided to settle near to his mother-in-law to help care for her. (We have not found land records for Wiley, but do need to search more for the Honts family’s land.) But we digress from this census record.

Take a look at the ages of what we assume are the children of this family. Louisa, the oldest, is 43, so Nancy would have been 13 at Louisa’s birth. Again, it is possible that Nancy was her mother, but fairly unlikely. Since Louisa was born in 1816, she could have been a full sibling of Wiley, as 15 or more years of child-bearing was not uncommon in those days. The next oldest child, Obedience, was born when Nancy was 22, which is plausible, but then there was a four year gap (Sarah E. Murrell was 30 at this census), with four more children then born at the usual 2-3 year spacing. A child who died young may have been within this gap, so we do need to look at more censuses for this family. The tough part is that federal censuses before 1850 only list the head of household, and then number of persons of various ages and sex, so it would be impossible to verify the names and exact ages of those persons.

So what are your conclusions from the given evidence? Have we solved the mystery of Wiley’s parents, or, possibly his father and step-mother? Or are there more questions to ask, more proof to find? Sadly, I feel the latter.

 

Notes, Sources, and References: 

  1. James Murrell-Nancy Cobb marriage record on Ancestry.com, no image of original and data originally from Dodd, Jordan R., et al.. Early American Marriages: Virginia to 1850. Bountiful, UT, USA: Precision Indexing Publishers, and  Virginia, Marriages, 1785-1940. Salt Lake City, Utah: FamilySearch, 2013.
  2. Various records on Ancestry.com.

Click to enlarge any image. Please contact us if you would like an image in higher resolution.

We would love to read your thoughts and comments about this post (see form below), and thank you for your time! All comments are moderated, however, due to the high intelligence and persistence of spammers/hackers who really should be putting their smarts to use for the public good instead of spamming our little blog.
 

Original content copyright 2013-2018 by Heritage Ramblings Blog and pmm.

Family history is meant to be shared, but the original content of this site may NOT be used for any commercial purposes unless explicit written permission is received from both the blog owner and author. Blogs or websites with ads and/or any income-generating components are included under “commercial purposes,” as are the large genealogy database websites. Sites that republish original HeritageRamblings.net content as their own are in violation of copyright as well, and use of full content is not permitted. 
Descendants and researchers MAY download images and posts to share with their families, and use the information on their family trees or in family history books with a small number of reprints. Please make sure to credit and cite the information properly.
 Please contact us if you have any questions about copyright or use of our blog material.

Tuesday’s Tip: Just Google It- Murrell DNA, Part 2

This entry is part 1 of 4 in the series Murrell DNA
James Murrell in “Encyclopedia of Virginia Biography,” Vol. IV, 1915.

Murrell Family, ancestors to the Roberts Family (Click for Family Tree)

Tuesday’s Tip: Just Google it.

“Mystery Mondays” seem to stick in the mind of this writer, and then it seems more research just has to be done to try to solve the mystery. Happened again this week, and the above excerpt is the result of “Tuesday’s Tip.”

Although unable yet to find a full copy of this 1915 encyclopedia online (other than the Ancestry.com version which downloads as a thin column), this excerpt tells us that some of our hypothesis was correct. Yes, Major James Murrell did have children with one wife, who died prior to 1818, when James remarried and had more children.

James’ first wife was Obedience (Rudd) Murrell, who died 16 May 1816. Note that her namesake, Obedience Margaret Murrell, was born just four days before, on 12 May. Her mother likely died of complications from childbirth with those dates being so close together.

This looks to be a pretty complete version of Major Murrell’s life, though we should probably look into the accuracy of these volumes, as many written at the turn of the 20th century were sometimes exaggerated or had incorrect data. If we assume that it is correct, however, we do not see our elusive Wiley A. Murrell listed as one of the children. James W. R. Murrell would be the closest possibility, Perhaps the “W” was for “William” and he went by “Wiley”? But there is no “Anderson” listed in this name, so likely not the right person. James W.R. was born in 1809 per this record, but he died in Arkansas, and we know Wiley was born in 1805 (or 1806) and died in Jasper County, Iowa.

So, it does not look like this James Murrell and Nancy Cobb are Wiley’s ancestors. Then why does the paper trail for so many DNA matches show these people? Is there some inaccuracy in the trees, or is James truly related, such as the brother of our Wiley’s father?

More research.

 

Notes, Sources, and References: 

 

Click to enlarge any image. Please contact us if you would like an image in higher resolution.

We would love to read your thoughts and comments about this post (see form below), and thank you for your time! All comments are moderated, however, due to the high intelligence and persistence of spammers/hackers who really should be putting their smarts to use for the public good instead of spamming our little blog.
 

Original content copyright 2013-2018 by Heritage Ramblings Blog and pmm.

Family history is meant to be shared, but the original content of this site may NOT be used for any commercial purposes unless explicit written permission is received from both the blog owner and author. Blogs or websites with ads and/or any income-generating components are included under “commercial purposes,” as are the large genealogy database websites. Sites that republish original HeritageRamblings.net content as their own are in violation of copyright as well, and use of full content is not permitted. 
Descendants and researchers MAY download images and posts to share with their families, and use the information on their family trees or in family history books with a small number of reprints. Please make sure to credit and cite the information properly.
 Please contact us if you have any questions about copyright or use of our blog material.

Mystery Monday: Murrell DNA, Part 3

This entry is part 3 of 4 in the series Murrell DNA
Cover of marriage bond, William Murrell-Nancy Mitchell marriage bond, 19 Oct 1829, Hardeman Co., Tennessee.

Murrell Family, ancestors of our Roberts Family (Click for Family Tree)

Our search for the parents of Wiley Anderson Murrell (1805-6 to 1885 ) continues with reviewing another of our DNA matches.

Did you notice the marriage date? Obviously, then, it appears this William Murrell (there are thousands of Murrells named William, it seems) who married Nancy Mitchell in 1829 could not be Wiley’s father, since they were married long after Wiley was born.

Title- Transcription/abstract of William Murrell-Nancy Mitchell marriage bond, 19 Oct 1829, Hardeman Co., Tennessee.
Transcription/abstract of William Murrell-Nancy Mitchell marriage bond, 19 Oct 1829, Hardeman Co., Tennessee.

 

Technically, however, this William could be Wiley’s father, if it was a second or third marriage for him. Other options include this William being a cousin, uncle, etc. Technically, he might even be a brother, if the family named more than one child William and called one Wiley- unusual, but still a possibility. We need to learn more details about this family to further assess this DNA match.

 

Notes, Sources, and References: 

  1. Online records.

Click to enlarge any image. Please contact us if you would like an image in higher resolution.

We would love to read your thoughts and comments about this post (see form below), and thank you for your time! All comments are moderated, however, due to the high intelligence and persistence of spammers/hackers who really should be putting their smarts to use for the public good instead of spamming our little blog.
 

Original content copyright 2013-2018 by Heritage Ramblings Blog and pmm.

Family history is meant to be shared, but the original content of this site may NOT be used for any commercial purposes unless explicit written permission is received from both the blog owner and author. Blogs or websites with ads and/or any income-generating components are included under “commercial purposes,” as are the large genealogy database websites. Sites that republish original HeritageRamblings.net content as their own are in violation of copyright as well, and use of full content is not permitted. 
Descendants and researchers MAY download images and posts to share with their families, and use the information on their family trees or in family history books with a small number of reprints. Please make sure to credit and cite the information properly.
 Please contact us if you have any questions about copyright or use of our blog material.

Mystery Monday: Murrell DNA, Part 4

This entry is part 4 of 4 in the series Murrell DNA
Word cloud made on WordArt.com.

Murrell Family, ancestors of our Roberts Family (Click for Family Tree)

William, James, and Elizabeth are three of the most common names used by Murrells across the country. In researching some of the ancestors in the trees of one of our DNA matches, we came upon “Chronicle,” published by the Campbell County [Virginia] Historical Society. There are two Murrells listed in the article, “Campbell County in War Times January-March 1863, Part 6 of a series,” by Amelia A. Talley.

Information from Order Book 28 of the Circuit Court:

12 January 1863– A report was received by the court concerning the division of slaves from the estate of the deceased James Murrell, and orders to record it were noted. (Page 6 of “Chronicle”)

[This short Order gives us a lot of information! It tells us that a James Murrell had resided in Campbell County, had died, and his will was being probated in the county. We now know he died before 12 Jan 1863, and he owned slaves. These are hints to look at censuses, slave schedules, deeds- slaves may be recorded in deed books, and he likely owned property if he had slaves to work it- and also the probate files for Campbell County. The probate file probably contains an inventory, administration papers, etc., if it has survived.

This James Murrell is most likely Major James Murrell, husband to 1) Obedience Rudd, and 2) Nancy Cobbs. The Major died 25 Dec 1859. One of his sons with Nancy was John Cobbs Murrell, probably the John C. Murrell listed below.]

2 March 1863– John C. Murrell furnished an acceptable, able-bodied substitute, and thus was exempted from military service. (Page 7 of “Chronicle”)

[The Confederate forces of Virginia were in need of more able-bodied men by March of 1863, and thus an “Exemption Board” was created to examine male residents ages 40-45 who had claimed to not be required to serve. Up until that time, those in certain professions had been exempted, such as those who had large plantations- this is probably the origin of the “rich man’s war, poor man’s fight” saying. (See page 8 of “Chronicle” for more information on plantation owner exemptions.)

Of those men who had claimed exemptions for various reasons, the Board determined that 24 of the men were indeed exempt due to “permanent bodily infirmity.” Additional allowed exemptions included two local doctors who were needed in the community, however, if they stopped practicing, they would be required to serve. Two of the previously-exempted men had exceeded the age of 45 years and were therefore legally exempt.  Eight other men had petitioned for exemption and the court overruled all of them; an additional five were determined to not be exempt, but they wished to appeal, and were granted a furlough of twenty days in which they could file and complete the appeal. John C. Murrell was one of five other men in this age group who furnished “able-bodied substitutes” that were accepted by the military, so John was then not required to serve in the Confederate Army. 

This entry gives us some of the context of the times as well as individual detail. The Confederacy was in need of suitable soldiers,  but had already enlisted or drafted all the young men it could. Next they had to find the most fit of the older generation, aged 40-45, to draft them into the Army. The “Exemption Board” held the lives of these men in their hands, and the lives of their families as well, so it must have been pretty tense in that courtroom. These men were able-bodied enough to run the farms, mills, businesses, and stores to keep a family and a town going, although the women and children most likely had to help out since the younger men were gone. With these older men now going off to war, getting crops planted and harvested, grain ground, etc., was going to be difficult, and protecting the homestead or other property from soldiers (on both sides!) would be even more challenging. Families knew what might be ahead for then- hunger, fields unused and businesses closed, goods and livestock looted or destroyed, and families torn apart by distance and the worst- the possibility that a loved one would not return.

We now also know a bit about the economics of the area- there were five men aged 40-45 who were affluent enough in 1863 to be able to pay a substitute to serve in their place. The cost of substitutes ranged from about $1,000 at the beginning of the war to $3,000 (over $56,000 in 2017 money), or maybe even more in the South where eligible men were scarce.]

9 March 1863– John C. Murrell was the Administrator of the estate of Anthony W. North, and as Administrator was taken to chancery court by North’s two underage daughters. The court appointed a guardian for three other children (presumably) of the deceased, and John was required to sell the slaves listed by the plaintiffs to the highest bidders. (Page 7 of “Chronicle”)

[John C. Murrell was a lawyer, per censuses and the “Encyclopedia of Virginia Biography”:

He then [after about 1844] studied law and was admitted to the bar of Campbell county, where he entered upon legal practice, and continued with unvaried success along the same line for the remainder of his life. He served in the capacity of commonwealth attorney from 1865 until his death, a period of almost a decade and a half. He was held in high esteem by his fellow citizens, occupying a prominent position, his advice and counsel being eagerly sought and followed.”

John would have been the lawyer for Anthony W. North, or was a close friend asked to be his Administrator.]

 

Notes, Sources, and References: 

  1. Tree-shaped word cloud made on WordArt.com. They can use the art to print t-shirts, bags, etc.- very easy, very cool, and lots of options.
  2. “Chronicle,” Campbell County [Virginia] Historical Society, Volume 24, Issue 1, January 2013. http://www.campbellcountyvahistoricalsociety.org/Newsletters/Jan%202013%20Newsletter%20Final%20Draft.pdf
  3. For information on inherited slaves and their prices (shudder- this is hard to write, harder to read), see “Black Confederates and Afro-Yankees in Civil War Virginia” by Ervin L. Jordan, especially pages 40-43, etc.–  https://books.google.com/books?id=366g6T8ADjkC&pg=PA40&lpg=PA40&dq=how+much+is+1863+$3000+worth+today&source=bl&ots=t_pQo4lHEz&sig=9Q2xT_e7kEPYfOb1hBD0UrfSNJI&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjas42TjdHaAhXNoFMKHS0vBR0Q6AEIdTAH#v=onepage&q=how%20much%20is%201863%20%243000%20worth%20today&f=false
  4. Civil War substitutes– http://www.thecivilwaromnibus.com/articles/133/hired-soldiers-substitutes-during-the-civil-war/
  5. Inflation calculator– http://www.in2013dollars.com/1863-dollars-in-2017?amount=3000
  6. “Encyclopedia of Virginia Biography,” Vol. 4, page 176.
  7. Note: The entries above have not been taken word-for-word from “Chronicle” but the abstracts have been used with additional research to tell the stories of the Order Book entries.

Click to enlarge any image. Please contact us if you would like an image in higher resolution.

We would love to read your thoughts and comments about this post (see form below), and thank you for your time! All comments are moderated, however, due to the high intelligence and persistence of spammers/hackers who really should be putting their smarts to use for the public good instead of spamming our little blog.
 

Original content copyright 2013-2018 by Heritage Ramblings Blog and pmm.

Family history is meant to be shared, but the original content of this site may NOT be used for any commercial purposes unless explicit written permission is received from both the blog owner and author. Blogs or websites with ads and/or any income-generating components are included under “commercial purposes,” as are the large genealogy database websites. Sites that republish original HeritageRamblings.net content as their own are in violation of copyright as well, and use of full content is not permitted. 
Descendants and researchers MAY download images and posts to share with their families, and use the information on their family trees or in family history books with a small number of reprints. Please make sure to credit and cite the information properly.
 Please contact us if you have any questions about copyright or use of our blog material.

SaveSaveSaveSave

SaveSave

SaveSave

SaveSave

SaveSave

SaveSave

SaveSave

SaveSave

SaveSave