image_pdfimage_print

Sorting Saturday: John and Fannie Broida’s Marriage License

Marriage license of John Zelig Broida and Fannie Rubinstein, 14 April 1904, in Jefferson County, Ohio, via FamilySearch.

Broida Family (Click for Family Tree)

Sorting through emails can be a pain, but sometimes there can be wonderful benefits. Today was one of those times, as an email from Dick Eastman’s Online Genealogy Newsletter (EOGN.com) mentioned that Find My Past had new US marriage certificates. I randomly plugged in the surname “Broida” and the first result was John Broida, born 1857 in Russia. That was our guy! I have long searched for a marriage certificate for John and both of his wives, Sarah Gittel (Frank) Broida, and Fannie Rubinstein. The marriage certificate of interest was for Fannie and John, and as a plus, there were quite a lot of other Broida marriages listed.

Things we learn from this marriage license application:

  1. John was living in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, in 1904.
  2. Fannie was living in Steubenville, Jefferson County, Ohio, in 1904, which is likely why the marriage took place there. (I would not have thought to search in Ohio!)
  3. John listed his father as Joseph Broida, which we knew, but states his mother Jennie’s maiden name was “Corklinsky.” We do know the family used the surname ‘Karklinsky’ in Lithuania, but it is curious that John used that name for his mother but not his father. I do not know whether or not Joseph Broida came to the US. If he did, that may explain the Broida name for him, and possibly Jennie had passed away in Europe, so John used the name she was known by there. Hopefully someone will know the answer to this.
  4. Fannie’s middle initial was “D.”
  5. John was 46, Fannie 30 when they married.
  6. Fannie was born in Russian Poland, not in Pennsylvania as previously thought.
  7.  The license application gives the names of Fannie’s parents, and her name as well as her father’s is spelled “Robinstein,” not “Rubenstein” as others has recorded it, and spell check likes to change it.
  8. The license notes that John had been married previously, to “Gussie Frank, now dead.” We have seen Gittel’s name as “Gussie” in a number of documents, so this verifies they are one and the same.
  9. Although it seemed this document would help us understand the puzzle of this couple, there is no previous marriage noted for Fannie. This will now require more research, as we had thought she married Jacob Cohen before 1892, when Ethel Broida was born. Ethel’s marriage certificate states her father was Jacob Cohen (and mother was Fannie). Ethel lived with John and Fannie after their marriage, as she was only 12 in 1904. John treated her like a beloved daughter, and she was the ‘mystery’ daughter whispered about in the family, which we recently identified through deep research. This puzzle of a previous marriage or not is another case where having a census return from 1890 might help, but those have been lost to us. We cannot find a 1900 census with her listed, or cannot tell if she is the same person- there were a lot of women named “Fannie Cohen,” and a lot named “Fannie Rubinstein” (or “Rubinstein”) in 1900. Perhaps it just wasn’t polite to mention that she had been married before, especially if it ended in divorce? So this omission on the marriage license will make us revisit our previous research and do a little more.
  10. The application states they were to be married by a Rabbi, but actually they were married by a Justice of the Peace on that same day, per the Marriage Certificate at the bottom.Typical of genealogy, this document solves a number of puzzles but actually gives us one more big one. That is why, when someone tells me, “I’ve finished my family tree,” my mind thinks, “Then you haven’t analyzed enough materials thoroughly enough!” But I never say that…

 

Notes, Sources, and References: 

  1. “Ohio, County Marriages, 1789-2013,” database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:9392-S59N-F6?cc=1614804&wc=Q6SP-W37%3A121346401%2C121652701 : 15 July 2014), Jefferson > Marriage index and records 1903-1905 vol 18 > image 116 of 458; county courthouses, Ohio.
  2. “Mystery Monday: Who was Ethel Broida Pincus?”–http://heritageramblings.net/2015/05/18/mystery-monday-who-was-ethel-broida-pincus/

 

 

Click to enlarge any image. Please contact us if you would like an image in higher resolution.

We would love to read your thoughts and comments about this post (see form below), and thank you for your time! All comments are moderated, however, due to the high intelligence and persistence of spammers/hackers who really should be putting their smarts to use for the public good instead of spamming our little blog.

Original content copyright 2013-2018 by Heritage Ramblings Blog and pmm.

Family history is meant to be shared, but the original content of this site may NOT be used for any commercial purposes unless explicit written permission is received from both the blog owner and author. Blogs or websites with ads and/or any income-generating components are included under “commercial purposes,” as are the large genealogy database websites. Sites that republish original HeritageRamblings.net content as their own are in violation of copyright as well, and use of full content is not permitted. 
Descendants and researchers MAY download images and posts to share with their families, and use the information on their family trees or in family history books with a small number of reprints. Please make sure to credit and cite the information properly, i.e, reference this blog.
 Please contact us if you have any questions about copyright or use of our blog material.

SaveSave

SaveSave

SaveSave

SaveSave

SaveSave

SaveSave

SaveSave

SaveSave

SaveSave

Thrifty Thursday: Frederick Asbury McMurray- Bank Director

Frederick Asbury McMurray, circa 1890?
Frederick Asbury “F. A.” McMurray, circa 1890?

McMurray Family (Click for Family Tree)

Previous posts have discussed that Frederick Asbury  “F.A.” McMurray was a farmer and auctioneer, and at one point also owned a second-hand store. (Convenient for leftover auction items!) Recently finding that he was also involved in the banking business in Newton, Iowa, however, was quite a surprise!

Frederick A. McMurray- director of the Citizens Bank, per “Past and Present of Jasper County, Iowa,” 1912, page 260, via archive.org.
Frederick A. McMurray- director of the Citizens Bank, per “Past and Present of Jasper County, Iowa,” 1912, page 261, via archive.org.

F. A. may have wanted to use the bank as a good investment and thus income during retirement, as he was about 62 when this book was published in 1912. In the census just two years earlier, he listed his occupation as “Auctioneer” and under the next column for “Industry” it stated, “country & city”- no mention of his interest in the bank.

Back in those days, farmers or skilled workers or immigrants, etc. often banded together to provide a bank friendly to their own group, or sometimes they would form an insurance company. Since this bank was initially called “Farmers and Merchants State Bank,” catering to those groups may have been the impetus to form the new institution. Farmers and merchants have unique needs for capital up front to purchase seed and fertilizer, or a shipment of goods, respectively, however they do not realize income until harvest or the goods are sold. Their income is cyclical, unlike others who get paid weekly for their labors. So a bank that was formed by farmers and merchants may have given a bit more leeway on a loan to either of these groups.

Those who follow this blog may also have  noticed the Horn name in this section of the book about Jasper County. Joe Horn was a descendant of our own Henry Horn, the Hessian soldier captured at Trenton and who then enlisted in the Patriot forces and fought for our freedom from Great Britain. Joe was a real estate agent in Newton, and his father, Frederick Monroe Horn, was the brother of our own Mary Ann Horn, who married Henderson McMurray. So actually Joe Horn and F. A. McMurray were cousins!

Definitely need a scorecard for all these folks! But always good to see if there is a familial relationship, as is often the case with business associates back in the day.

 

 

Notes, Sources, and References: 

  1. “Past and Present of Jasper County, Iowa,” 1912, page 260-1, via archive.org
  2. Previous posts on Frederick A. McMurray include– “

    Workday Wednesday: Frederick McMurray Crying a Farm Sale

Friday’s Faces from the Past: The McMurray-Benjamin Family

Sunday’s Obituary: Frederick Asbury McMurray

 

Click to enlarge any image. Please contact us if you would like an image in higher resolution.

We would love to read your thoughts and comments about this post (see form below), and thank you for your time! All comments are moderated, however, due to the high intelligence and persistence of spammers/hackers who really should be putting their smarts to use for the public good instead of spamming our little blog.
 

Original content copyright 2013-2018 by Heritage Ramblings Blog and pmm.

Family history is meant to be shared, but the original content of this site may NOT be used for any commercial purposes unless explicit written permission is received from both the blog owner and author. Blogs or websites with ads and/or any income-generating components are included under “commercial purposes,” as are the large genealogy database websites. Sites that republish original HeritageRamblings.net content as their own are in violation of copyright as well, and use of full content is not permitted. 
Descendants and researchers MAY download images and posts to share with their families, and use the information on their family trees or in family history books with a small number of reprints. Please make sure to credit and cite the information properly.
 Please contact us if you have any questions about copyright or use of our blog material.

SaveSave

SaveSave

SaveSave

SaveSave

SaveSave

SaveSave

Tuesday’s Tip: Censuses and Murrell DNA, Part 5

John Cobb Murrell and his wife Cornelia Frances (Smithson) Murrell in the 1850 US Federal Census of Campbell County, Virginia.

Murrell Family, ancestors of our Roberts Family (Click for Family Tree)

Tuesday’s Tip: Analyze each column of the census carefully to learn more about a family.

Today we continue looking at families that we have found DNA connections to, in the hope of finding out more about our elusive ancestor, Wiley Anderson Murrell. Seeing this census with missing data brings up an important tip- always look a bit further.

John Cobb Murrell and Cornelia Frances (Smithson) Murrell were newlyweds when enumerated in this 1850 U.S. Federal Census in Campbell County, Virginia. (They had married about 6 months earlier, on 15 March 1850.) Analyzing the columns, we noticed that the first two, for dwelling and family number, have no entry for John or any of the others living in that home. Looking at the names of persons listed, only Cornelia appears to be related, plus the four persons listed after Cornelia are all adults, and the two children listed above John do not have a parent listed. So it is time to… yes, turn the page- though we probably can’t call it that anymore since we are not using physical paper. (!!)

Household in which John Cobb Murrell and his wife Cornelia Frances (Smithson) Murrell are found in the 1850 US Federal Census of Campbell County, Virginia.

Checking the page before, at the bottom, tells us that John and Cornelia were living in Dwelling #499, that of the Innkeeper Jack Elliot. “Tavern” appears written in under family number after Jack is listed as the head of Family #499. It appears that Jack was living with his wife and children of 7, 10, 5, and, if we go back to the page with John and Cornelia, a 2 year old and a child 4/12, or 4 months, old.

The couple listed after Cornelia could be married or siblings since they have the same last name, and he is a minister of the MEC (Methodist Episcopal Church). There is also a merchant listed as living at the inn, and a bar keeper- he probably works at the bar at the inn/tavern. (There are other entries on nearby pages with a bar keeper living at an inn.)

The 1850 census doesn’t give us all the information we might like, but it does state that John was a lawyer, and both he and Cornelia were born in Virginia. There is another lawyer listed on the page, living in his own home with his wife and family. Another minister (of the Baptist Church?) rounds out the jobs requiring college education, with the rest of the residents having honest trades like carpenter, wheelwright, “Taylor,” blacksmith, and farmer. All were born in Virginia except for the minister living at the inn, and two of the children attended school. There are tick marks for them in the column for “over 20 and cannot read nor write” but those boys are just ten and six years old, so likely those were some sort of check mark for the computation that was done, as we see a similar mark by “Pennsylvania” where the Methodist minister was born.

No “value of real estate owned” is listed for John C. Murrell, but there is none listed for the remaining adults at the inn, and that is likely why they live at the inn.

Analyzing the columns carefully when we first looked at this census was important. When we found that the dwelling and family information was missing, we had a hint- we needed to check around to learn more about the family. Seeing that John and Cornelia were living in an inn with other professional people tells us a bit about the newlyweds, just getting started in their life together. How sweet! And we would not have known any of this, if we had missed that two boxes were empty on this census.

 

Notes, Sources, and References: 

 

Click to enlarge any image. Please contact us if you would like an image in higher resolution.

We would love to read your thoughts and comments about this post (see form below), and thank you for your time! All comments are moderated, however, due to the high intelligence and persistence of spammers/hackers who really should be putting their smarts to use for the public good instead of spamming our little blog.
 

Original content copyright 2013-2018 by Heritage Ramblings Blog and pmm.

Family history is meant to be shared, but the original content of this site may NOT be used for any commercial purposes unless explicit written permission is received from both the blog owner and author. Blogs or websites with ads and/or any income-generating components are included under “commercial purposes,” as are the large genealogy database websites. Sites that republish original HeritageRamblings.net content as their own are in violation of copyright as well, and use of full content is not permitted. 
Descendants and researchers MAY download images and posts to share with their families, and use the information on their family trees or in family history books with a small number of reprints. Please make sure to credit and cite the information properly.
 Please contact us if you have any questions about copyright or use of our blog material.

SaveSave

Some Global Housekeeping

“We Help Mommy” c 1956

Part of the reason the blog has been quiet lately is GDPR. You may not have heard of it, but you likely have gotten quite a lot of requests to update subscriptions, consent to cookies, etc. when you visit websites. Getting ready for GDPR has been a stressful nightmare of research, no answers yet, and wondering why one part of the world can dictate terms to another.

But we are global now.

The European Union’s “General Data Protection Regulation” or GDPR, went into effect on 25 May 2018. It is a huge document designed to provide strict privacy and consumer rights to internet users, something truly needed. It is a sweeping law and no one is quite sure how it is going to work, so that is a big part of the problem and global stress.

While the majority of readers of this blog are from the U.S., we have had a few from overseas (the U.K., which will be in the E.U. until 2019), plus of course, thousands of foreign hackers as well. (We personally don’t care about the rights of the latter group.) California already has some data protection requirements too, so we are providing this Privacy Policy in order to comply the best a small family history blog can do.

This website is paid for entirely out of our own pocket- no advertising is allowed on it.  We do not make money from the website through ads or page clicks, and we do not market anything to you (except a love for family history, we hope); we do not pass your info on to other marketing sites.

Despite all that, we MUST make these changes (or so some believe, others in the US are doing nothing) or possibly be subject to very large fines, even though we do not live in the E.U. Seeing what big companies have done with the data from Facebook, Google, etc., the law is probably good, although it has led to the closing of some important genealogy and family history websites, and small family blogs as well, as compliance is too onerous and/or expensive (both time- and money-wise). Hopefully we can navigate this well enough to keep this blog going- but I would rather be writing about our family history than coming up with a privacy policy. And I would rather be BAKING “Grandma Edie’s Sugar Cookies” than researching and writing about computer cookies.

Please see our Privacy Policy and Cookies page, and do not get too frustrated always having to agree to the use of Cookies. It’s our brave new world.

Now that we have helped to make some  history by complying with this new law, let’s get back to researching the family history past. Thanks for your patience.

 

Notes, Sources, and References: 

  1. “Thankful Thursday- Edith Roberts Luck’s Christmas Cookies” — http://heritageramblings.net/2014/12/25/thankful-thursday-edith-roberts-lucks-christmas-cookies/

 

Click to enlarge any image. Please contact us if you would like an image in higher resolution.

We would love to read your thoughts and comments about this post (see form below), and thank you for your time! All comments are moderated, however, due to the high intelligence and persistence of spammers/hackers who really should be putting their smarts to use for the public good instead of spamming our little blog.
 

Original content copyright 2013-2018 by Heritage Ramblings Blog and pmm.

Family history is meant to be shared, but the original content of this site may NOT be used for any commercial purposes unless explicit written permission is received from both the blog owner and author. Blogs or websites with ads and/or any income-generating components are included under “commercial purposes,” as are the large genealogy database websites. Sites that republish original HeritageRamblings.net content as their own are in violation of copyright as well, and use of full content is not permitted. 
Descendants and researchers MAY download images and posts to share with their families, and use the information on their family trees or in family history books with a small number of reprints. Please make sure to credit and cite the information properly.
 Please contact us if you have any questions about copyright or use of our blog material.

SaveSave

SaveSave

SaveSave

SaveSave

Wedding Wednesday: Lizzy (Helbling) Spahn and Frank Bussman

Helbling Family (Click for Family Tree)

We could not tell the story any better than this article.

Lizzie (Helbling) Spahn-Frank Brussman marriage clipping, unknown source, part 1.

 

The story continues:

Lizzie (Helbling) Spahn-Frank Brussman marriage clipping, unknown source, part 2.

 

Notes, Sources, and References: 

  1. Mary Theresa (Knipshield) Helbling (1810-1891), mother of Elizabeth “Lizzy” Barbara (Helbling) Spahn (1839-1928), would have been the cause of the “interference” that broke off the original betrothal.
  2. Frank Brussman (1839-1898) was originally “Francis” and his name is often spelled “Bussman.”
  3. Frank Spahn (1862-1882) was the son who drowned; the other son was Frederick A. J. Spahn (1865-1937).
  4. Family clipping.

 

Click to enlarge any image. Please contact us if you would like an image in higher resolution.

We would love to read your thoughts and comments about this post (see form below), and thank you for your time! All comments are moderated, however, due to the high intelligence and persistence of spammers/hackers who really should be putting their smarts to use for the public good instead of spamming our little blog.
 

Original content copyright 2013-2018 by Heritage Ramblings Blog and pmm.

Family history is meant to be shared, but the original content of this site may NOT be used for any commercial purposes unless explicit written permission is received from both the blog owner and author. Blogs or websites with ads and/or any income-generating components are included under “commercial purposes,” as are the large genealogy database websites. Sites that republish original HeritageRamblings.net content as their own are in violation of copyright as well, and use of full content is not permitted. 
Descendants and researchers MAY download images and posts to share with their families, and use the information on their family trees or in family history books with a small number of reprints. Please make sure to credit and cite the information properly.
 Please contact us if you have any questions about copyright or use of our blog material.

SaveSave

SaveSave

SaveSave